NO CHARGES — BUT WILL FBI BOSS DO A CLINTON TELL-ALL? Comey could spill beans at hearings

FBI Director James Comey took no questions after his bombshell aouncement Tuesday that he would not recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton over her private email system, but he - and his boss - may soon answer to lawmakers.

In saying he would not press the Justice Department to pursue an indictment against the likely Democrat nominee for president, Comey nonetheless laid out a strong case that she had violated multiple statutes regulating govement employees' safeguarding of sensitive emails. That had key lawmakers, including Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah and Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., demanding to know how he justified his decision.

"The job of the FBI is to provide the fact patte to the Justice Department and not make the political calculation that this is what a reasonable prosecutor would do. That's not the job of the FBI," Chaffetz, who chairs the Oversight Committee, told Fox News host Bret Baier Tuesday night.

Fox News has leaed both Lynch and Comey may appear at House hearings on the email case in the near future. Comey, who Fox News has leaed would appear willingly, likely won't appear before the committee until September, when it retus from its upcoming recess.

House and Senate Judiciary and Oversight committees could all seek testimony from Comey and Attoey General Loretta Lynch.

Lynch was already slated to testify next Tuesday at an oversight hearing where Fox News has leaed she will be questioned about the email investigation, and possibly her secret meeting with former President Bill Clinton just days before her department dropped the email case against the former first lady.

Comey's decision was seen in many quarters as a punt. By branding Clinton's use of unauthorized servers to send and receive sensitive -- and in some cases top secret -- information as "extremely careless," Comey gave Clinton's critics plenty of ammunition.

By stopping short of referring the results of his bureau's year-long probe to the Attoey General to pursue an indictment, Comey may have removed the biggest obstacle in Clinton's path to the White House.

“Our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case,” Comey said.

The development leaves it to the voters -- especially those who remain undecided -- to decide whether they believe Clinton did nothing criminal in her handling of emails while secretary of state — or whether it just becomes another questionable chapter in the Clinton political saga that has spaed a quarter century that both she and her husband seem able to survive.

Crooked Hillary Clinton and her team "were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information." Not fit!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 6, 2016

Johnson, who chairs the Homeland Security and Govement Affairs Committee, fired off a letter to Comey hours after the 13-minute news conference demanding answers to a series of questions. Among them, Johnson asked how many agents worked on the case, how much taxpayer money was spent on it and, perhaps more significantly, how Comey arrived at his conclusion.

“If the evidence that the FBI collected about Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email account and server did not constitute gross negligence, what set of facts would cause the FBI to recommend criminal charges under the gross negligence standard?” Johnson wrote.

Johnson recounted the statement, in which the FBI director detailed what he called “extremely careless” handling of sensitive govement emails, and said the bureau could not be sure Clinton’s server was not and even added that govement employees who behaved similarly could expect to be sanctioned.

Goodlatte, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, also wrote Comey and detailed several other cases in which lower-ranking govement employees have been prosecuted for mishandling sensitive information.

"I find the timing and maer of your aouncement uniquely troubling in light of last week's secret meeting between Attoey General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton," Goodlatte wrote.

Goodlatte and Johnson both noted that one of the statutes Clinton was suspected of violating does not require criminal intent. The law is written to impose an obligation on govement employees to safeguard sensitive documents, and thus requires a finding of gross negiligence.

Comey said 110 emails in 52 email chains discovered on Clinton’s unauthorized server were classified at the time they were sent or received, including some that were “top secret.”

Trump is already using Comey's words to blast Clinton, even as he faults the FBI director for not pursuing the case.

“Comey let Clinton off the hook,” Trump said in a statement.

Fox News' Malia Zimmerman and Chad Pergram contributed to this report.